top of page

Montage, montage, монтаж: the career of a word: Ivan Cerecina

  • Writer: ART HISTORY
    ART HISTORY
  • 1 day ago
  • 2 min read

Powerful Ideas: New Research in Art History at the University of Sydney is convened by Mary Roberts and presented by the discipline of Art History at the University of Sydney, with support from the Power Institute.


Thursday 12 March 2026, 03:00PM - 04:30PM. Schaeffer Library Seminar Room 210, Mills Building (A26) Free. This research seminar series is also accessible via Zoom.

Sergei Eisenstein, Беседа [Conversation] (1944). Black graphite, coloured pencil on paper. 

Film scholar Ivan Cerecina traces the history of the word "montage" in its movement between French, English, and Russian contexts, and considers its enduring legacy as a key method of modernity.

In his 1945 essay “How I Became a Film Director,” Sergei Eisenstein recalls the apparition of a word, “borrowed from industry,” that had entered both the Russian language and his own artistic conscience during the creative efflorescence of the 1920s. The French “montage” – from “monter”, to assemble, erect, or mount – had once denoted the fitting together of industrial parts: machinery, vehicles, piping. The Russian loanword,montazh, came to designate the editing together of strips of film, at a moment when the rhythms of the factory floor and the principles of mechanical assembly became models for thinking about cinematic construction, social organisation, and perception itself. 

This paper traces the etymology, migration, and legacy of montage across French, English, and Russian, showing how the term has continually mediated between the technical and the conceptual, the manual and the intellectual. It explores how, after its theorisation in the Soviet 1920s, and its adoption in Hollywood in the late silent era, montage was reclaimed in postwar France—by filmmakers such as Vedrès, Resnais, and Marker—as a means of reassembling fragments of the past and negotiating the temporal and historical ruptures of modernity. In this renewed encounter, montage returns to its original language but carries with it the sedimented meanings of its international career. The paper concludes by tracing the continuing life of the word as a method of modernity: an enduring principle of composition that links the assembly line, the film reel, and the digital timeline.  


People

Ivan Cerecina

Ivan Cerecina teaches film studies at The University of Sydney. His work has been published in Screen, Camera Obscura, and Framework. His first monograph, Assembly Lines: Montage in Postwar French Film, is forthcoming with University of Minnesota Press. 


Comments


About  
 

GLAM is a blogsite run by students and staff in Art History, Art Curating, and Museum & Heritage Studies. It features reviews, articles and events about art, culture, galleries, museums, people and places on campus and beyond.

Contact
 

Email: GLAMatsydney@gmail.com

Fill in the form to contact us or submit an article. We welcome contributions by students and alumni.

Information 
 

This site is managed by Art History in the School of Arts, Communication and English at the University of Sydney. The University is located on the unceded lands of the Gadigal people of the Eora nation, we pay respect to the traditional owners and their elders, past, present and emerging.

Proudly created by kevinotooledesign.com

Thanks for submitting!

bottom of page